A
|
Demographic – trends in population characteristics
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
84
|
Potential competitive advantage of the region to attract the emerging green economy
|
25
|
26
|
51
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
7
|
Relocation of national/international companies to Region/CT.
|
23
|
24
|
47
|
5
|
Matching employer needs with qualified employees
|
27
|
18
|
45
|
21
|
Transportation infrastructure. Does it support the current/future needs of Region?
|
25
|
18
|
43
|
80
|
Work ethic of new workers
|
22
|
21
|
43
|
62
|
How do we bring young people back to the area? Who do we want to attract to this area?
|
23
|
19
|
42
|
79
|
Inadequate labor pool (e.g., aging of tradespersons and disinterest of emerging workforce)
|
27
|
13
|
40
|
20
|
Education in the Region reflecting the needs of the Region?
|
24
|
15
|
39
|
32
|
Rising health costs
|
22
|
17
|
39
|
27
|
Loss of manufacturing jobs
|
26
|
12
|
38
|
36
|
Longer commuting distances for local residents
|
16
|
20
|
36
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
6
|
Loss of “job benefits” in the Region. Vs. State/US?
|
16
|
18
|
34
|
33
|
High cost of housing
|
24
|
10
|
34
|
1
|
Young residents are leaving the Region. Is this unique to NW? The State? Where are they going?
|
25
|
8
|
33
|
2
|
“Undocumented” residents/citizens. How do we get “accurate” data to determine the impact on the Region?
|
9
|
24
|
33
|
47
|
Emergency services volunteers
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
23
|
Internal and external perception of the Region. Perceived as “wealthy”, “in the middle of nowhere”, individual towns want to “keep their town a secret”
|
16
|
14
|
30
|
25
|
Aging population
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
64
|
Possibility of economic and racial separation
|
14
|
16
|
30
|
78
|
Loss of State and Federal representation due to shrinking population
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
49
|
Consumer demand
|
13
|
15
|
28
|
37
|
Distance from other areas of the state
|
10
|
12
|
22
|
82
|
Aging workers not retiring (failure to create openings for younger workers)
|
12
|
10
|
22
|
 |
|
|
|
|
B
|
Education – meeting the needs of the Region
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
84
|
Potential competitive advantage of the region to attract the emerging green economy
|
25
|
26
|
51
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
34
|
Workforce development and educational training
|
27
|
19
|
46
|
5
|
Matching employer needs with qualified employees
|
27
|
18
|
45
|
80
|
Work ethic of new workers
|
22
|
21
|
43
|
20
|
Education in the Region reflecting the needs of the Region?
|
24
|
15
|
39
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
35
|
Need for technically trained workers
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
65
|
Local educational access from elementary to college/higher ed. (including English language ed. For immigrants)
|
23
|
10
|
33
|
68
|
Childcare issues (costs and availability)
|
17
|
8
|
25
|
37
|
Distance from other areas of the state
|
10
|
12
|
22
|
70
|
Obesity
|
10
|
9
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
Social – general attitudes, preferences, tastes and beliefs
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
7
|
Relocation of national/international companies to Region/CT.
|
23
|
24
|
47
|
63
|
The future of healthcare
|
21
|
23
|
44
|
80
|
Work ethic of new workers
|
22
|
21
|
43
|
62
|
How do we bring young people back to the area? Who do we want to attract to this area?
|
23
|
19
|
42
|
79
|
Inadequate labor pool (e.g., aging of tradespersons and disinterest of emerging workforce)
|
27
|
13
|
40
|
76
|
Attitudes of community about development
|
26
|
13
|
39
|
9
|
Capacity of NW Region to influence its own destiny vs. State influence.
|
20
|
17
|
37
|
36
|
Longer commuting distances for local residents
|
16
|
20
|
36
|
4
|
Energy costs and trends
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
6
|
Loss of “job benefits” in the Region. Vs. State/US?
|
16
|
18
|
34
|
1
|
Young residents are leaving the Region. Is this unique to NW? The State? Where are they going?
|
25
|
8
|
33
|
2
|
“Undocumented” residents/citizens. How do we get “accurate” data to determine the impact on the Region?
|
9
|
24
|
33
|
67
|
Quality of life (culture, art, restaurants)
|
24
|
9
|
33
|
41
|
Economic viability of farms –loss of farmland and open space
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
47
|
Emergency services volunteers
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
23
|
Internal and external perception of the Region. Perceived as “wealthy”, “in the middle of nowhere”, individual towns want to “keep their town a secret”
|
16
|
14
|
30
|
25
|
Aging population
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
64
|
Possibility of economic and racial separation
|
14
|
16
|
30
|
59
|
Sprawl
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
69
|
The future of community involvement
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
24
|
Changing values re: sustainability
|
11
|
16
|
27
|
68
|
Childcare issues (costs and availability)
|
17
|
8
|
25
|
82
|
Aging workers not retiring (failure to create openings for younger workers)
|
12
|
10
|
22
|
70
|
Obesity
|
10
|
9
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
D
|
Governmental – policies, regulations, legal developments, political philosophy
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
71
|
Political developments in foreign companies
|
15
|
30
|
45
|
63
|
The future of healthcare
|
21
|
23
|
44
|
69
|
The future of community involvement
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
60
|
Political change
|
13
|
8
|
21
|
|
1. Federal
|
|
|
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
74
|
How do we ensure that we coordinate our efforts to get the area’s fair share of resources
|
23
|
18
|
41
|
53
|
National issues
|
16
|
20
|
36
|
54
|
Increased government regulation
|
25
|
8
|
33
|
29
|
Limited industrial sites
|
22
|
7
|
29
|
78
|
Loss of State and Federal representation due to shrinking population
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
|
2. State
|
|
|
|
75
|
Economic incentive for new or existing businesses
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
22
|
State policy re: incentives for new businesses. Only for manufacturing. E.g., does NOT encourage entrepreneurs.
|
25
|
22
|
47
|
31
|
Energy availability
|
25
|
17
|
42
|
74
|
How do we ensure that we coordinate our efforts to get the area’s fair share of resources
|
23
|
18
|
41
|
83
|
Is a coordinated effort or what type of coordinated effort is best for the region?
|
23
|
17
|
40
|
32
|
Rising health costs
|
22
|
17
|
39
|
38
|
High cost of doing business
|
27
|
8
|
35
|
39
|
Unpredictable and unfavorable tax structure
|
27
|
8
|
35
|
19
|
CT tax structure. Impact. Does this affect Region more than rest of State?
|
22
|
11
|
33
|
30
|
High cost of energy
|
26
|
7
|
33
|
78
|
Loss of State and Federal representation due to shrinking population
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
77
|
Availability of land
|
20
|
8
|
28
|
|
3. Local
|
|
|
|
75
|
Economic incentive for new or existing businesses
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
83
|
Is a coordinated effort or what type of coordinated effort is best for the region?
|
23
|
17
|
40
|
8
|
Planning/execution capacity of Region. Historically by individual town.
|
24
|
14
|
38
|
9
|
Capacity of NW Region to influence its own destiny vs. State influence.
|
20
|
17
|
37
|
4
|
Energy costs and trends
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
6
|
Loss of “job benefits” in the Region. Vs. State/US?
|
16
|
18
|
34
|
65
|
Local educational access from elementary to college/higher ed. (including English language ed. For immigrants)
|
23
|
10
|
33
|
10
|
Determining the “center/focus” of efforts.(who and where?)
|
13
|
19
|
32
|
18
|
Land use zoning regulations.
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
59
|
Sprawl
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
77
|
Availability of land
|
20
|
8
|
28
|
11
|
Defining roles each of the towns play in the Region – in every way
|
15
|
11
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
Taxes – federal, state, local
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
75
|
Economic incentive for new or existing businesses
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
44
|
Attracting new business to the region – film industry
|
28
|
22
|
50
|
42
|
Economic viability of city centers
|
24
|
22
|
46
|
39
|
Unpredictable and unfavorable tax structure
|
27
|
8
|
35
|
33
|
High cost of housing
|
24
|
10
|
34
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
25
|
Aging population
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
22
|
State policy re: incentives for new businesses. Only for manufacturing. E.g., does NOT encourage entrepreneurs.
|
25
|
22
|
47
|
20
|
Education in the Region reflecting the needs of the Region?
|
24
|
15
|
39
|
19
|
CT tax structure. Impact. Does this affect Region more than rest of State?
|
22
|
11
|
33
|
18
|
Land use zoning regulations.
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
17
|
Cost of land
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
F
|
Environmental – pollution, global warming, remediation
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
|
1. Regulations
|
|
|
|
|
2. Tourism
|
|
|
|
84
|
Potential competitive advantage of the region to attract the emerging green economy
|
25
|
26
|
51
|
21
|
Transportation infrastructure. Does it support the current/future needs of Region?
|
25
|
18
|
43
|
4
|
Energy costs and trends
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
35
|
Need for technically trained workers
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
55
|
Limitations and/or aging infrastructure
|
25
|
9
|
34
|
28
|
Brownfield issues
|
21
|
12
|
33
|
54
|
Increased government regulation
|
25
|
8
|
33
|
66
|
Environmental regs. and concerns
|
22
|
9
|
31
|
29
|
Limited industrial sites
|
22
|
7
|
29
|
59
|
Sprawl
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
77
|
Availability of land
|
20
|
8
|
28
|
46
|
Internet & cell phone access and availability
|
19
|
6
|
25
|
57
|
Importing most of our food
|
11
|
12
|
23
|
45
|
Challenges in tourism – casinos, high gas prices
|
10
|
11
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
Technological – direct, enabling and indirect
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
84
|
Potential competitive advantage of the region to attract the emerging green economy
|
25
|
26
|
51
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
51
|
Jobs of the future?
|
21
|
23
|
44
|
80
|
Work ethic of new workers
|
22
|
21
|
43
|
31
|
Energy availability
|
25
|
17
|
42
|
79
|
Inadequate labor pool (e.g., aging of tradespersons and disinterest of emerging workforce)
|
27
|
13
|
40
|
48
|
Technology as an economic driver
|
26
|
8
|
34
|
30
|
High cost of energy
|
26
|
7
|
33
|
46
|
Internet & cell phone access and availability
|
19
|
6
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
H
|
Economic – trends and forces shaping the economy
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
7
|
Relocation of national/international companies to Region/CT.
|
23
|
24
|
47
|
5
|
Matching employer needs with qualified employees
|
27
|
18
|
45
|
71
|
Political developments in foreign companies
|
15
|
30
|
45
|
63
|
The future of healthcare
|
21
|
23
|
44
|
8
|
Planning/execution capacity of Region. Historically by individual town.
|
24
|
14
|
38
|
4
|
Energy costs and trends
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
6
|
Loss of “job benefits” in the Region. Vs. State/US?
|
16
|
18
|
34
|
14
|
Role of tourism in the Region.
|
21
|
11
|
32
|
68
|
Childcare issues (costs and availability)
|
17
|
8
|
25
|
|
1. Global
|
|
|
|
71
|
Political developments in foreign companies
|
15
|
30
|
45
|
31
|
Energy availability
|
25
|
17
|
42
|
30
|
High cost of energy
|
26
|
7
|
33
|
|
2. National
|
|
|
|
34
|
Workforce development and educational training
|
27
|
19
|
46
|
32
|
Rising health costs
|
22
|
17
|
39
|
53
|
National issues
|
16
|
20
|
36
|
38
|
High cost of doing business
|
27
|
8
|
35
|
41
|
Economic viability of farms –loss of farmland and open space
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
52
|
Weather factors
|
12
|
10
|
22
|
|
3. State/local
|
|
|
|
84
|
Potential competitive advantage of the region to attract the emerging green economy
|
25
|
26
|
51
|
75
|
Economic incentive for new or existing businesses
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
16
|
Affordable work force housing. (State definition = no more than 30% of income).
|
24
|
22
|
46
|
15
|
Converting old structures to appealing places to work.
|
23
|
22
|
45
|
51
|
Jobs of the future?
|
21
|
23
|
44
|
72
|
Availability of investment capital
|
20
|
20
|
40
|
20
|
Education in the Region reflecting the needs of the Region?
|
24
|
15
|
39
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
33
|
High cost of housing
|
24
|
10
|
34
|
48
|
Technology as an economic driver
|
26
|
8
|
34
|
43
|
Effect of new retail stores on existing small businesses
|
21
|
12
|
33
|
17
|
Cost of land
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
18
|
Land use zoning regulations.
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
69
|
The future of community involvement
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
58
|
Regional branding
|
19
|
9
|
28
|
77
|
Availability of land
|
20
|
8
|
28
|
57
|
Importing most of our food
|
11
|
12
|
23
|
|
4. Regulations
|
|
|
|
|
5. Tourism
|
|
|
|
|
6. Commerce
|
|
|
|
44
|
Attracting new business to the region – film industry
|
28
|
22
|
50
|
22
|
State policy re: incentives for new businesses. Only for manufacturing. E.g., does NOT encourage entrepreneurs.
|
25
|
22
|
47
|
27
|
Loss of manufacturing jobs
|
26
|
12
|
38
|
28
|
Brownfield issues
|
21
|
12
|
33
|
43
|
Effect of new retail stores on existing small businesses
|
21
|
12
|
33
|
24
|
Changing values re: sustainability
|
11
|
16
|
27
|
57
|
Importing most of our food
|
11
|
12
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
Global
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
71
|
Political developments in foreign companies
|
15
|
30
|
45
|
31
|
Energy availability
|
25
|
17
|
42
|
72
|
Availability of investment capital
|
20
|
20
|
40
|
35
|
Need for technically trained workers
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
30
|
High cost of energy
|
26
|
7
|
33
|
50
|
Effect of emerging markets (energy usage, competition)
|
20
|
11
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
J
|
History/culture of NW Region
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
|
1. Tourism
|
|
|
|
|
2. Leisure
|
|
|
|
79
|
Inadequate labor pool (e.g., aging of tradespersons and disinterest of emerging workforce)
|
27
|
13
|
40
|
83
|
Is a coordinated effort or what type of coordinated effort is best for the region?
|
23
|
17
|
40
|
76
|
Attitudes of community about development
|
26
|
13
|
39
|
8
|
Planning/execution capacity of Region. Historically by individual town.
|
24
|
14
|
38
|
4
|
Energy costs and trends
|
28
|
7
|
35
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
67
|
Quality of life (culture, art, restaurants)
|
24
|
9
|
33
|
14
|
Role of tourism in the Region.
|
21
|
11
|
32
|
41
|
Economic viability of farms –loss of farmland and open space
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
23
|
Internal and external perception of the Region. Perceived as “wealthy”, “in the middle of nowhere”, individual towns want to “keep their town a secret”
|
16
|
14
|
30
|
25
|
Aging population
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
58
|
Regional branding
|
19
|
9
|
28
|
24
|
Changing values re: sustainability
|
11
|
16
|
27
|
11
|
Defining roles each of the towns play in the Region – in every way
|
15
|
11
|
26
|
37
|
Distance from other areas of the state
|
10
|
12
|
22
|
82
|
Aging workers not retiring (failure to create openings for younger workers)
|
12
|
10
|
22
|
45
|
Challenges in tourism – casinos, high gas prices
|
10
|
11
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
Land Use/Infrastructure
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
|
1. Transportation
|
|
|
|
73
|
Attracting companies to spark economic growth
|
27
|
23
|
50
|
16
|
Affordable work force housing. (State definition = no more than 30% of income).
|
24
|
22
|
46
|
42
|
Economic viability of city centers
|
24
|
22
|
46
|
15
|
Converting old structures to appealing places to work.
|
23
|
22
|
45
|
21
|
Transportation infrastructure. Does it support the current/future needs of Region?
|
25
|
18
|
43
|
3
|
Public transportation – regional and statewide. Future? Positive, negative or both?
|
22
|
20
|
42
|
61
|
Infrastructure – adequate now? future?
|
26
|
13
|
39
|
36
|
Longer commuting distances for local residents
|
16
|
20
|
36
|
26
|
Young residents leaving the region and the state
|
26
|
9
|
35
|
33
|
High cost of housing
|
24
|
10
|
34
|
28
|
Brownfield issues
|
21
|
12
|
33
|
40
|
Heavy reliance on residential property tax base
|
24
|
9
|
33
|
41
|
Economic viability of farms –loss of farmland and open space
|
18
|
13
|
31
|
66
|
Environmental regs. and concerns
|
22
|
9
|
31
|
17
|
Cost of land
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
18
|
Land use zoning regulations.
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
25
|
Aging population
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
29
|
Limited industrial sites
|
22
|
7
|
29
|
59
|
Sprawl
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
77
|
Availability of land
|
20
|
8
|
28
|
24
|
Changing values re: sustainability
|
11
|
16
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
L
|
Organizational Process
|
Importance
|
Uncertainty
|
Total
|
|
1. NGOs
|
|
|
|
7
|
Relocation of national/international companies to Region/CT.
|
23
|
24
|
47
|
34
|
Workforce development and educational training
|
27
|
19
|
46
|
74
|
How do we ensure that we coordinate our efforts to get the area’s fair share of resources
|
23
|
18
|
41
|
81
|
Coordinated regional effort for economic development, not economic discouragement (Regional Econ. Development Czar)
|
24
|
16
|
40
|
83
|
Is a coordinated effort or what type of coordinated effort is best for the region?
|
23
|
17
|
40
|
8
|
Planning/execution capacity of Region. Historically by individual town.
|
24
|
14
|
38
|
12
|
Identification of “top 10 things” potential/future employers want.
|
23
|
15
|
38
|
9
|
Capacity of NW Region to influence its own destiny vs. State influence.
|
20
|
17
|
37
|
10
|
Determining the “center/focus” of efforts.(who and where?)
|
13
|
19
|
32
|
56
|
Business support organizations
|
20
|
11
|
31
|
69
|
The future of community involvement
|
16
|
13
|
29
|
58
|
Regional branding
|
19
|
9
|
28
|
11
|
Defining roles each of the towns play in the Region – in every way
|
15
|
11
|
26
|